ESET PROTECTvsMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
How 10 AI models weigh ESET PROTECT against Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on the 1 buying question where both came up.
- ESET PROTECT
- 81%of answers named it
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- 100%of answers named it
- Placed higher
- 0–40times ESET PROTECT vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, over 40 model rankings that listed either
- Models leaning
- 0–10toward ESET PROTECT vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Which models prefer which
Share of each model's answers that named each product, and how often its ranking put one above the other (a product listed beats one left off) · On the 1 shared question, every wording
| Model | ESET PROTECT | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Placed higher | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 92% | 100% | 0–4 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| GPT-6 Luna | 100% | 100% | 0–4 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| Gemini 4 Argon | 92% | 100% | 0–4 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| Qwen 3.8 Flash | 67% | 100% | 0–4 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100% | 100% | 0–4 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| GLM-5.3 | 92% | 100% | 0–4 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| Kimi K3 | 50% | 100% | 0–4 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| MiniMax M3 | 100% | 100% | 0–4 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| Mistral Large 4 | 100% | 100% | 0–4 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| Nemotron 3 Ultra | 17% | 100% | 0–4 | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
What the models say about ESET PROTECT
One reason per model, from the shared questions
- Claude Haiku 5.5
Lightweight endpoint protection with strong detection and low system resource use.
- GPT-6 Luna
Efficient endpoint protection with reliable detection and relatively low system impact.
- Gemini 4 Argon
Lightweight, reliable multi-layered protection with low false-positive rates ideal for resource-constrained IT teams.
- Qwen 3.8 Flash
Low-footprint protection favored by resource-constrained IT.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
Lightweight footprint, strong malware detection, ideal for diverse environments.
- GLM-5.3
Lightweight, reliable, great for small to mid-size businesses.
- Kimi K3
Lightweight, reliable protection with low noise, especially good for lean IT teams.
- MiniMax M3
Lightweight, highly effective engine ideal for SMBs needing reliable core protection.
- Mistral Large 4
Lightweight, dependable protection ideal for SMBs and mixed environments.
What the models say about Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
One reason per model, from the shared questions
- Claude Haiku 5.5
Deep Windows integration and strong detection, good value for Microsoft-centric organizations.
- GPT-6 Luna
Strong protection and response, especially for organizations already invested in Microsoft security tools.
- Gemini 4 Argon
Unmatched native Windows integration and tremendous value for organizations already using Microsoft ecosystems.
- Qwen 3.8 Flash
Native Windows integration, strong value for M365 shops.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
Deep Windows integration, excellent value in E5, rapidly improving cross-platform.
- GLM-5.3
Deep Windows integration, low cost, strong XDR capabilities.
- Kimi K3
Deep Windows integration, strong value for Microsoft-centric businesses, solid EDR.
- MiniMax M3
Best value for Microsoft-centric shops with deep Windows integration and strong EDR.
- Mistral Large 4
Seamless Windows integration and strong value bundled with Microsoft 365.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra
Deep OS integration, excellent for Microsoft 365 shops
Tracked since October 25, 2026. Each time the panel answers these questions again, both shares are added here.
Question by question
Share of all answers that named each, every wording pooled, with its place among every product named · Both-named questions first
| Question | ESET PROTECT | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Best endpoint security software | 81% #7 | 100% #1 |