Microsoft Graph APIvsopenpyxl

How 10 AI models weigh Microsoft Graph API against openpyxl on the 2 buying questions where both came up.

Microsoft Graph API
3%of answers named it
openpyxl
24%of answers named it
Placed higher
3–20times Microsoft Graph API vs openpyxl, over 23 model rankings that listed either
Models leaning
1–7toward Microsoft Graph API vs openpyxl; 2 even

Which models prefer which

Share of each model's answers that named each product, and how often its ranking put one above the other (a product listed beats one left off) · On the 2 shared questions, every wording

ModelMicrosoft Graph APIopenpyxlPlaced higherLeans
Claude Haiku 5.50%25%0–2openpyxl
GPT-6 Luna13%6%1–0Microsoft Graph API
Gemini 4 Argon0%0%0–0Even
Qwen 3.8 Flash0%38%0–1openpyxl
DeepSeek V4 Pro0%38%0–3openpyxl
GLM-5.30%13%0–1openpyxl
Kimi K319%19%2–2Even
MiniMax M30%31%0–3openpyxl
Mistral Large 40%25%0–3openpyxl
Nemotron 3 Ultra0%44%0–5openpyxl

What the models say about Microsoft Graph API

One reason per model, from the shared questions

  • GPT-6 LunaBest for agents working with Microsoft 365 files stored in OneDrive or SharePoint.
  • Kimi K3Native SDK access to Word, Excel, PowerPoint files in enterprise environments.

What the models say about openpyxl

One reason per model, from the shared questions

  • Claude Haiku 5.5Widely used Python library for reading and writing Excel .xlsx files.
  • Qwen 3.8 FlashFree, dependable pure-Python choice for xlsx read/write.
  • DeepSeek V4 ProDominant Python choice for Excel files, supports formulas and styling.
  • Kimi K3Most practical Excel read/write SDK for agent automation.
  • MiniMax M3Go-to Python library for creating and modifying Excel xlsx files.
  • Mistral Large 4De facto Python standard for Excel read/write with solid performance and features.
  • Nemotron 3 UltraTop Python library for Excel xlsx read/write.

Tracked since October 25, 2026. Each time the panel answers these questions again, both shares are added here.

Question by question

Share of all answers that named each, every wording pooled, with its place among every product named · Both-named questions first