Best AI coding assistants (worth paying for?)

We asked 10 models: Which AI coding assistants are actually worth paying for? Each named its own top 10.

Asked 4 ways: List request · Buyer asking for advice · Search query · Worth paying for?. Share of voice pools every wording.

Agreement between models
67%
Same model, run twice
79%
Different picks
22

When agreement between models is well below a model's agreement with itself, the split reflects real differences in taste rather than randomness.

The consensus

Each cell is the position that model gave the pick; blank means it left the pick off. Click a row for each model's reasoning.

#PickScoreListed byClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra

7 lower-scoring picks are not shown; every ballot below lists them in full.

Most divisive

Picks most models listed, at very different positions

Hot takes

Picks that appear on only one ballot

Every ballot

Hover a pick to find it on the other ballots. Marked picks appear on no other ballot.

Claude Haiku 5.5

  1. Cursor
  2. GitHub Copilot
  3. Claude Code
  4. Windsurf
  5. Amazon Q Developer
  6. Tabnine
  7. Replit
  8. Devin
  9. Cody
  10. JetBrains AI Assistant

69% with consensus · 92% self-consistent

GPT-6 Luna

  1. Cursor
  2. GitHub Copilot
  3. Claude Code
  4. Windsurf
  5. OpenAI Codex
  6. JetBrains AI Assistant
  7. Gemini Code Assist
  8. Amazon Q Developer
  9. Cody
  10. Replit

67% with consensus · 96% self-consistent

Gemini 4 Argon

  1. Cursor
  2. GitHub Copilot
  3. Claude
  4. Windsurf
  5. Supermaven
  6. ChatGPT
  7. v0
  8. JetBrains AI Assistant
  9. Tabnine
  10. Cody

61% with consensus · 92% self-consistent

Qwen 3.8 Flash

  1. GitHub Copilot
  2. Cursor
  3. Claude Code
  4. Windsurf
  5. Amazon Q Developer
  6. OpenAI Codex
  7. Tabnine
  8. JetBrains AI Assistant
  9. Replit
  10. Gemini Code Assist

83% with consensus · 92% self-consistent

DeepSeek V4 Pro

  1. GitHub Copilot
  2. Cursor
  3. Windsurf
  4. Supermaven
  5. Tabnine
  6. Claude
  7. Claude Code
  8. Cline
  9. Cody
  10. Replit

88% with consensus · 74% self-consistent

GLM-5.3

  1. GitHub Copilot
  2. Cursor
  3. Claude Code
  4. Windsurf
  5. JetBrains AI Assistant
  6. ChatGPT
  7. Aider
  8. Amazon Q Developer
  9. Claude
  10. Tabnine

83% with consensus · 65% self-consistent

Kimi K3

  1. GitHub Copilot
  2. Cursor
  3. Windsurf
  4. Claude Code
  5. Aider
  6. Zed
  7. Claude
  8. Tabnine
  9. Cody
  10. Cline

88% with consensus · 59% self-consistent

MiniMax M3

  1. Cursor
  2. GitHub Copilot
  3. Claude Code
  4. Windsurf
  5. Tabnine
  6. JetBrains AI Assistant
  7. Cody
  8. Continue
  9. Zed
  10. Aider

74% with consensus · 80% self-consistent

Mistral Large 4

  1. GitHub Copilot
  2. Cursor
  3. Windsurf
  4. Claude
  5. Cline
  6. Cody
  7. Amazon CodeWhisperer
  8. Claude Code
  9. JetBrains AI Assistant
  10. ChatGPT

82% with consensus · 63% self-consistent

Nemotron 3 Ultra

  1. GitHub Copilot
  2. Cursor
  3. Windsurf
  4. Tabnine
  5. Claude Code
  6. Cody
  7. Amazon CodeWhisperer
  8. Claude
  9. Replit Ghostwriter
  10. Amazon Q Developer

90% with consensus · 80% self-consistent

Who agrees with whom

Overlap between two models' lists, weighted toward the top · 100 means identical · Color runs from 55 (lightest) to 87 (darkest)

Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra
Claude Haiku 5.5856978626965875665
GPT-6 Luna857076577262875660
Gemini 4 Argon697055656057716456
Qwen 3.8 Flash787655748679717078
DeepSeek V4 Pro625765747282638285
GLM-5.3697260867282717276
Kimi K3656257798282677884
MiniMax M3878771716371675869
Mistral Large 4565664708272785884
Nemotron 3 Ultra656056788576846984