Best CI/CD platforms (worth paying for?)

We asked 10 models: Which CI/CD platforms are actually worth paying for? Each named its own top 10.

Asked 4 ways: List request · Buyer asking for advice · Search query · Worth paying for?. Share of voice pools every wording.

Agreement between models
80%
Same model, run twice
87%
Different picks
25

When agreement between models is well below a model's agreement with itself, the split reflects real differences in taste rather than randomness.

The consensus

Each cell is the position that model gave the pick; blank means it left the pick off. Click a row for each model's reasoning.

#PickScoreListed byClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra

10 lower-scoring picks are not shown; every ballot below lists them in full.

Most divisive

Picks most models listed, at very different positions

Hot takes

Picks that appear on only one ballot

Every ballot

Hover a pick to find it on the other ballots. Marked picks appear on no other ballot.

Claude Haiku 5.5

  1. GitHub Actions
  2. GitLab
  3. CircleCI
  4. Buildkite
  5. Jenkins
  6. Harness
  7. Azure Pipelines
  8. Bitbucket Pipelines
  9. TeamCity
  10. AWS CodePipeline

99% with consensus · 92% self-consistent

GPT-6 Luna

  1. GitHub Actions
  2. Buildkite
  3. GitLab
  4. CircleCI
  5. Azure Pipelines
  6. Harness
  7. Jenkins
  8. TeamCity
  9. CloudBees CI
  10. Bitbucket Pipelines

84% with consensus · 91% self-consistent

Gemini 4 Argon

  1. GitHub Actions
  2. GitLab
  3. Buildkite
  4. CircleCI
  5. Harness
  6. Azure Pipelines
  7. TeamCity
  8. Spacelift
  9. Dagger
  10. Bitrise

87% with consensus · 97% self-consistent

Qwen 3.8 Flash

  1. GitHub Actions
  2. GitLab
  3. CircleCI
  4. Buildkite
  5. Jenkins
  6. Harness
  7. Semaphore
  8. AWS CodePipeline
  9. Travis CI
  10. Spinnaker

92% with consensus · 85% self-consistent

DeepSeek V4 Pro

  1. GitHub Actions
  2. GitLab
  3. CircleCI
  4. Jenkins
  5. Buildkite
  6. Harness
  7. Bitbucket Pipelines
  8. Travis CI
  9. Azure DevOps
  10. Octopus Deploy

92% with consensus · 85% self-consistent

GLM-5.3

  1. GitLab
  2. CircleCI
  3. GitHub Actions
  4. Jenkins
  5. Azure Pipelines
  6. Buildkite
  7. TeamCity
  8. GitHub Enterprise Cloud
  9. Bitbucket Pipelines
  10. Jenkins X

67% with consensus · 59% self-consistent

Kimi K3

  1. GitHub Actions
  2. GitLab
  3. CircleCI
  4. Buildkite
  5. Azure DevOps
  6. Jenkins
  7. TeamCity
  8. Travis CI
  9. Bitbucket Pipelines
  10. Bamboo

90% with consensus · 95% self-consistent

MiniMax M3

  1. GitHub Actions
  2. GitLab
  3. CircleCI
  4. Jenkins
  5. Buildkite
  6. Drone
  7. Bitbucket Pipelines
  8. Azure Pipelines
  9. Spinnaker
  10. Argo CD

88% with consensus · 93% self-consistent

Mistral Large 4

  1. GitHub Actions
  2. GitLab
  3. CircleCI
  4. Buildkite
  5. Jenkins
  6. Azure DevOps
  7. TeamCity
  8. Harness
  9. Bitbucket Pipelines
  10. Travis CI

94% with consensus · 90% self-consistent

Nemotron 3 Ultra

  1. GitHub Actions
  2. GitLab
  3. CircleCI
  4. Buildkite
  5. Bitrise
  6. Semaphore
  7. Jenkins
  8. Codefresh
  9. Bitbucket Pipelines
  10. Travis CI

85% with consensus · 84% self-consistent

Who agrees with whom

Overlap between two models' lists, weighted toward the top · 100 means identical · Color runs from 56 (lightest) to 96 (darkest)

Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra
Claude Haiku 5.5838693926788899285
GPT-6 Luna838678765676737874
Gemini 4 Argon868681795880768277
Qwen 3.8 Flash937881916087859088
DeepSeek V4 Pro927679916588919083
GLM-5.3675658606563676558
Kimi K3887680878863849686
MiniMax M3897376859167848683
Mistral Large 4927882909065968686
Nemotron 3 Ultra857477888358868386