Best product analytics tools (worth paying for?)

We asked 10 models: Which product analytics tools are actually worth paying for? Each named its own top 10.

Asked 4 ways: List request · Buyer asking for advice · Search query · Worth paying for?. Share of voice pools every wording.

Agreement between models
81%
Same model, run twice
91%
Different picks
23

When agreement between models is well below a model's agreement with itself, the split reflects real differences in taste rather than randomness.

The consensus

Each cell is the position that model gave the pick; blank means it left the pick off. Click a row for each model's reasoning.

#PickScoreListed byClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra

8 lower-scoring picks are not shown; every ballot below lists them in full.

Most divisive

Picks most models listed, at very different positions

Hot takes

Picks that appear on only one ballot

Every ballot

Hover a pick to find it on the other ballots. Marked picks appear on no other ballot.

Claude Haiku 5.5

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. Heap
  4. PostHog
  5. Pendo
  6. FullStory
  7. Google Analytics
  8. Looker
  9. Hotjar
  10. Contentsquare

94% with consensus · 98% self-consistent

GPT-6 Luna

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. PostHog
  4. Heap
  5. Pendo
  6. Contentsquare
  7. FullStory
  8. Glassbox
  9. June
  10. Google Analytics

89% with consensus · 92% self-consistent

Gemini 4 Argon

  1. Amplitude
  2. PostHog
  3. Mixpanel
  4. Pendo
  5. Heap
  6. FullStory
  7. LogRocket
  8. June
  9. Glassbox
  10. Quantum Metric

82% with consensus · 93% self-consistent

Qwen 3.8 Flash

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. Heap
  4. Pendo
  5. Hotjar
  6. FullStory
  7. PostHog
  8. LogRocket
  9. Glassbox
  10. Crazy Egg

92% with consensus · 92% self-consistent

DeepSeek V4 Pro

  1. Mixpanel
  2. Amplitude
  3. Heap
  4. PostHog
  5. Pendo
  6. FullStory
  7. Hotjar
  8. LogRocket
  9. June
  10. Baremetrics

84% with consensus · 95% self-consistent

GLM-5.3

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. PostHog
  4. Pendo
  5. Heap
  6. FullStory
  7. Hotjar
  8. Contentsquare
  9. Productboard
  10. MoEngage

90% with consensus · 91% self-consistent

Kimi K3

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. PostHog
  4. Heap
  5. Pendo
  6. FullStory
  7. June
  8. Contentsquare
  9. Glassbox
  10. Statsig

90% with consensus · 85% self-consistent

MiniMax M3

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. Heap
  4. PostHog
  5. FullStory
  6. Hotjar
  7. LogRocket
  8. Pendo
  9. Segment
  10. ChartMogul

93% with consensus · 86% self-consistent

Mistral Large 4

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. Heap
  4. Pendo
  5. PostHog
  6. FullStory
  7. Segment
  8. Hotjar
  9. Google Analytics
  10. Datadog

92% with consensus · 93% self-consistent

Nemotron 3 Ultra

  1. Mixpanel
  2. Amplitude
  3. Heap
  4. Pendo
  5. PostHog
  6. FullStory
  7. June
  8. LogRocket
  9. Kissmetrics
  10. Google Analytics

78% with consensus · 84% self-consistent

Who agrees with whom

Overlap between two models' lists, weighted toward the top · 100 means identical · Color runs from 67 (lightest) to 96 (darkest)

Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra
Claude Haiku 5.5887987788789899275
GPT-6 Luna888482739096828571
Gemini 4 Argon798479678686777968
Qwen 3.8 Flash878279768583899176
DeepSeek V4 Pro787367767474787793
GLM-5.3879086857492848870
Kimi K3899686837492848674
MiniMax M3898277897884848972
Mistral Large 4928579917788868978
Nemotron 3 Ultra757168769370747278