Best product analytics tools

We asked 10 models: The best product analytics tools for software companies. Each named its own top 10.

Asked 4 ways: List request · Buyer asking for advice · Search query · Worth paying for?. Share of voice pools every wording.

Agreement between models
82%
Same model, run twice
92%
Different picks
19

When agreement between models is well below a model's agreement with itself, the split reflects real differences in taste rather than randomness.

The consensus

Each cell is the position that model gave the pick; blank means it left the pick off. Click a row for each model's reasoning.

#PickScoreListed byClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra

4 lower-scoring picks are not shown; every ballot below lists them in full.

Most divisive

Picks most models listed, at very different positions

Hot takes

Picks that appear on only one ballot

Every ballot

Hover a pick to find it on the other ballots. Marked picks appear on no other ballot.

Claude Haiku 5.5

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. Heap
  4. Pendo
  5. FullStory
  6. Google Analytics
  7. Hotjar
  8. PostHog
  9. Looker
  10. Contentsquare

93% with consensus · 98% self-consistent

GPT-6 Luna

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. PostHog
  4. Heap
  5. Pendo
  6. Contentsquare
  7. FullStory
  8. Google Analytics
  9. June
  10. Indicative

87% with consensus · 95% self-consistent

Gemini 4 Argon

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. PostHog
  4. Pendo
  5. Heap
  6. FullStory
  7. LogRocket
  8. June
  9. Google Analytics
  10. Glassbox

89% with consensus · 98% self-consistent

Qwen 3.8 Flash

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. Heap
  4. Pendo
  5. Google Analytics
  6. FullStory
  7. Hotjar
  8. PostHog
  9. LogRocket
  10. Segment

95% with consensus · 86% self-consistent

DeepSeek V4 Pro

  1. Mixpanel
  2. Amplitude
  3. Heap
  4. Pendo
  5. PostHog
  6. FullStory
  7. LogRocket
  8. June
  9. Hotjar
  10. Kissmetrics

80% with consensus · 95% self-consistent

GLM-5.3

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. Pendo
  4. PostHog
  5. Heap
  6. FullStory
  7. Google Analytics
  8. Hotjar
  9. Countly
  10. Indicative

91% with consensus · 90% self-consistent

Kimi K3

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. PostHog
  4. Heap
  5. Pendo
  6. FullStory
  7. Google Analytics
  8. June
  9. Datadog
  10. Hotjar

90% with consensus · 95% self-consistent

MiniMax M3

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. Heap
  4. PostHog
  5. Pendo
  6. Hotjar
  7. FullStory
  8. LogRocket
  9. Segment
  10. Kissmetrics

92% with consensus · 84% self-consistent

Mistral Large 4

  1. Amplitude
  2. Mixpanel
  3. Heap
  4. Pendo
  5. PostHog
  6. Segment
  7. FullStory
  8. Google Analytics
  9. Hotjar
  10. Plausible Analytics

95% with consensus · 93% self-consistent

Nemotron 3 Ultra

  1. Mixpanel
  2. Amplitude
  3. Heap
  4. Pendo
  5. PostHog
  6. FullStory
  7. Google Analytics
  8. June
  9. LogRocket
  10. Kissmetrics

82% with consensus · 81% self-consistent

Who agrees with whom

Overlap between two models' lists, weighted toward the top · 100 means identical · Color runs from 70 (lightest) to 97 (darkest)

Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra
Claude Haiku 5.5828296748685879076
GPT-6 Luna829182708795878672
Gemini 4 Argon829183769093868575
Qwen 3.8 Flash968283758685899077
DeepSeek V4 Pro747076757173777797
GLM-5.3868790867190868874
Kimi K3859593857390878776
MiniMax M3878786897786879175
Mistral Large 4908685907788879178
Nemotron 3 Ultra767275779774767578