Best applicant tracking systems (buyer asking for advice)

We asked 10 models: We're hiring a lot this year and need to organize candidates and interviews. Which applicant tracking system would you recommend? Each named its own top 10.

Asked 4 ways: List request · Buyer asking for advice · Search query · Worth paying for?. Share of voice pools every wording.

Agreement between models
80%
Same model, run twice
87%
Different picks
20

When agreement between models is well below a model's agreement with itself, the split reflects real differences in taste rather than randomness.

The consensus

Each cell is the position that model gave the pick; blank means it left the pick off. Click a row for each model's reasoning.

#PickScoreListed byClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra

5 lower-scoring picks are not shown; every ballot below lists them in full.

Most divisive

Picks most models listed, at very different positions

Hot takes

Picks that appear on only one ballot

Every ballot

Hover a pick to find it on the other ballots. Marked picks appear on no other ballot.

Claude Haiku 5.5

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. Workable
  5. BambooHR
  6. SmartRecruiters
  7. Recruitee
  8. JazzHR
  9. Breezy HR
  10. JobScore

92% with consensus · 94% self-consistent

GPT-6 Luna

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. SmartRecruiters
  5. iCIMS
  6. Workable
  7. Jobvite
  8. BambooHR
  9. Workday
  10. JazzHR

92% with consensus · 87% self-consistent

Gemini 4 Argon

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Ashby
  3. Lever
  4. Workable
  5. SmartRecruiters
  6. JazzHR
  7. Pinpoint
  8. iCIMS
  9. Rippling
  10. Breezy HR

86% with consensus · 86% self-consistent

Qwen 3.8 Flash

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Ashby
  3. Lever
  4. Workable
  5. iCIMS
  6. Bullhorn
  7. JazzHR
  8. Recruiterflow
  9. Jobvite
  10. SmartRecruiters

81% with consensus · 77% self-consistent

DeepSeek V4 Pro

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Workday
  4. BambooHR
  5. JazzHR
  6. Ashby
  7. Breezy HR
  8. SmartRecruiters
  9. Recruitee
  10. Zoho Recruit

72% with consensus · 88% self-consistent

GLM-5.3

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. iCIMS
  5. Workable
  6. SmartRecruiters
  7. JazzHR
  8. BambooHR
  9. Workday
  10. Breezy HR

94% with consensus · 82% self-consistent

Kimi K3

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Workable
  4. Ashby
  5. BambooHR
  6. SmartRecruiters
  7. iCIMS
  8. JazzHR
  9. Breezy HR
  10. Rippling

91% with consensus · 91% self-consistent

MiniMax M3

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. SmartRecruiters
  5. iCIMS
  6. Workable
  7. Workday
  8. JazzHR
  9. Recruiterflow
  10. BambooHR

92% with consensus · 85% self-consistent

Mistral Large 4

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. SmartRecruiters
  5. Workday
  6. BambooHR
  7. Workable
  8. iCIMS
  9. Oracle Taleo
  10. Teamtailor

88% with consensus · 87% self-consistent

Nemotron 3 Ultra

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Workable
  4. BambooHR
  5. iCIMS
  6. JazzHR
  7. SmartRecruiters
  8. Ashby
  9. Jobvite
  10. Recruitee

83% with consensus · 88% self-consistent

Who agrees with whom

Overlap between two models' lists, weighted toward the top · 100 means identical · Color runs from 59 (lightest) to 95 (darkest)

Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra
Claude Haiku 5.5848177768892848482
GPT-6 Luna847978689283959079
Gemini 4 Argon817987638280807773
Qwen 3.8 Flash777887598276807074
DeepSeek V4 Pro766863597275707677
GLM-5.3889282827287928582
Kimi K3928380767587838289
MiniMax M3849580807092839077
Mistral Large 4849077707685829073
Nemotron 3 Ultra827973747782897773