Best applicant tracking systems (worth paying for?)

We asked 10 models: Which applicant tracking systems are actually worth paying for? Each named its own top 10.

Asked 4 ways: List request · Buyer asking for advice · Search query · Worth paying for?. Share of voice pools every wording.

Agreement between models
75%
Same model, run twice
85%
Different picks
18

When agreement between models is well below a model's agreement with itself, the split reflects real differences in taste rather than randomness.

The consensus

Each cell is the position that model gave the pick; blank means it left the pick off. Click a row for each model's reasoning.

#PickScoreListed byClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra

3 lower-scoring picks are not shown; every ballot below lists them in full.

Most divisive

Picks most models listed, at very different positions

Hot takes

Picks that appear on only one ballot

Every ballot

Hover a pick to find it on the other ballots. Marked picks appear on no other ballot.

Claude Haiku 5.5

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. SmartRecruiters
  5. Workable
  6. Recruitee
  7. iCIMS
  8. Workday Recruiting
  9. JazzHR
  10. BambooHR

91% with consensus · 83% self-consistent

GPT-6 Luna

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. Workable
  5. SmartRecruiters
  6. iCIMS
  7. Teamtailor
  8. JazzHR
  9. Jobvite
  10. BambooHR

94% with consensus · 91% self-consistent

Gemini 4 Argon

  1. Ashby
  2. Greenhouse
  3. Lever
  4. Workable
  5. Pinpoint
  6. Teamtailor
  7. SmartRecruiters
  8. Recruitee
  9. JazzHR
  10. Breezy HR

65% with consensus · 84% self-consistent

Qwen 3.8 Flash

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Workable
  4. BambooHR
  5. JazzHR
  6. Zoho Recruit
  7. Ashby
  8. Manatal
  9. Teamtailor
  10. Recruitee

78% with consensus · 79% self-consistent

DeepSeek V4 Pro

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. JazzHR
  5. Breezy HR
  6. Workday HCM
  7. SmartRecruiters
  8. Recruitee
  9. Workable
  10. Pinpoint

82% with consensus · 85% self-consistent

GLM-5.3

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Ashby
  3. Lever
  4. Workable
  5. iCIMS
  6. SmartRecruiters
  7. JazzHR
  8. Breezy HR
  9. BambooHR
  10. Recruit CRM

87% with consensus · 82% self-consistent

Kimi K3

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. Workable
  5. SmartRecruiters
  6. Breezy HR
  7. iCIMS
  8. JazzHR
  9. BambooHR
  10. Zoho Recruit

95% with consensus · 86% self-consistent

MiniMax M3

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. iCIMS
  5. SmartRecruiters
  6. Workable
  7. Workday Recruiting
  8. Recruitee
  9. JazzHR
  10. BambooHR

89% with consensus · 75% self-consistent

Mistral Large 4

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. Workday Recruiting
  5. SmartRecruiters
  6. Workable
  7. BambooHR
  8. Teamtailor
  9. Recruitee
  10. iCIMS

87% with consensus · 92% self-consistent

Nemotron 3 Ultra

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Workable
  4. BambooHR
  5. JazzHR
  6. iCIMS
  7. SmartRecruiters
  8. Jobvite
  9. Recruitee
  10. Ashby

83% with consensus · 97% self-consistent

Who agrees with whom

Overlap between two models' lists, weighted toward the top · 100 means identical · Color runs from 51 (lightest) to 94 (darkest)

Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra
Claude Haiku 5.5906370798190938775
GPT-6 Luna906674788694908680
Gemini 4 Argon636651587164616151
Qwen 3.8 Flash707451696874687189
DeepSeek V4 Pro797858697483797771
GLM-5.3818671687488837673
Kimi K3909464748388888578
MiniMax M3939061687983888974
Mistral Large 4878661717776858971
Nemotron 3 Ultra758051897173787471