Best applicant tracking systems (search query)

We asked 10 models: best applicant tracking system Each named its own top 10.

Asked 4 ways: List request · Buyer asking for advice · Search query · Worth paying for?. Share of voice pools every wording.

Agreement between models
79%
Same model, run twice
84%
Different picks
18

When agreement between models is well below a model's agreement with itself, the split reflects real differences in taste rather than randomness.

The consensus

Each cell is the position that model gave the pick; blank means it left the pick off. Click a row for each model's reasoning.

#PickScoreListed byClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra

3 lower-scoring picks are not shown; every ballot below lists them in full.

Most divisive

Picks most models listed, at very different positions

Hot takes

Picks that appear on only one ballot

Every ballot

Hover a pick to find it on the other ballots. Marked picks appear on no other ballot.

Claude Haiku 5.5

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. iCIMS
  4. Workday
  5. Ashby
  6. SmartRecruiters
  7. Workable
  8. BambooHR
  9. JazzHR
  10. SAP SuccessFactors

88% with consensus · 80% self-consistent

GPT-6 Luna

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. SmartRecruiters
  5. Workday
  6. iCIMS
  7. Workable
  8. JazzHR
  9. BambooHR
  10. Breezy HR

94% with consensus · 92% self-consistent

Gemini 4 Argon

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. iCIMS
  5. Workable
  6. SmartRecruiters
  7. JazzHR
  8. BambooHR
  9. Workday
  10. Rippling Recruiting

95% with consensus · 90% self-consistent

Qwen 3.8 Flash

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. iCIMS
  4. Ashby
  5. Workday
  6. Bullhorn
  7. SmartRecruiters
  8. Workable
  9. JazzHR
  10. SAP SuccessFactors

87% with consensus · 66% self-consistent

DeepSeek V4 Pro

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Workday
  4. JazzHR
  5. Ashby
  6. Breezy HR
  7. BambooHR
  8. SmartRecruiters
  9. Pinpoint
  10. Freshteam

74% with consensus · 87% self-consistent

GLM-5.3

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. iCIMS
  4. Ashby
  5. Workday
  6. JazzHR
  7. Workable
  8. SAP SuccessFactors
  9. SmartRecruiters
  10. Breezy HR

87% with consensus · 81% self-consistent

Kimi K3

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Workable
  4. Ashby
  5. SmartRecruiters
  6. iCIMS
  7. BambooHR
  8. JazzHR
  9. Breezy HR
  10. Bullhorn

88% with consensus · 96% self-consistent

MiniMax M3

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. Workable
  5. SmartRecruiters
  6. iCIMS
  7. JazzHR
  8. Workday
  9. Recruitee
  10. BambooHR

93% with consensus · 82% self-consistent

Mistral Large 4

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. Ashby
  4. Workday
  5. SmartRecruiters
  6. Workable
  7. BambooHR
  8. iCIMS
  9. Taleo
  10. JazzHR

90% with consensus · 88% self-consistent

Nemotron 3 Ultra

  1. Greenhouse
  2. Lever
  3. iCIMS
  4. Workable
  5. BambooHR
  6. SmartRecruiters
  7. JazzHR
  8. Workday
  9. Jobvite
  10. Recruitee

82% with consensus · 82% self-consistent

Who agrees with whom

Overlap between two models' lists, weighted toward the top · 100 means identical · Color runs from 68 (lightest) to 93 (darkest)

Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 LunaGemini 4 ArgonQwen 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3Kimi K3MiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Nemotron 3 Ultra
Claude Haiku 5.5878792799181818785
GPT-6 Luna878986778686919276
Gemini 4 Argon878985738688938786
Qwen 3.8 Flash928685749379818280
DeepSeek V4 Pro797773747873728068
GLM-5.3918686937879828181
Kimi K3818688797379918582
MiniMax M3819193817282918883
Mistral Large 4879287828081858875
Nemotron 3 Ultra857686806881828375